Cosan S.A. (CSANY)
Market price: $2.16
Related companies
2 valuation methods
- P / B: $1.78 to $4.14 (midpoint $2.70)
- EV / EBITDA: $2.87 to $4.50 (midpoint $3.39)
How each method works
P / B: $1.78 to $4.14 (midpoint $2.70)
Values the stock at a peer multiple of its book (net asset) value — most meaningful for asset-heavy and financial companies whose balance sheet drives value.
- How it’s calculated
- We take book value per share (total assets minus total liabilities, from the latest balance sheet, divided by shares outstanding) and multiply it by the range of price-to-book multiples the peer group trades at.
- Why it fits this industry
- Where the balance sheet is the business — lenders, insurers, asset-heavy operators — the price the market pays for a dollar of net assets is a natural yardstick.
- Reading this bar
- The bar is the per-share value range this method implies: a conservative low, a central estimate, and an optimistic high. If the current price sits below the bar, the market is pricing the shares below what this method's inputs suggest; if it sits above, the market is pricing them higher. No single bar is a verdict — methods disagree for good reasons, so read the whole field together. Asset-light companies (brands, software) legitimately trade far above book value, so for them a P/B bar well below the price is usually structure, not signal.
P / B = (1.00/1.52/2.33)× book_value_per_share 1.78 ≈ 1.78/2.70/4.14 (per_share)
EV / EBITDA: $2.87 to $4.50 (midpoint $3.39)
Values the whole business at a peer multiple of its cash operating earnings (EBITDA) — the workhorse comparison for capital-intensive, profitable companies.
- How it’s calculated
- We take the company's cash operating earnings over the last twelve months (EBITDA — earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization) and multiply them by the range of EV/EBITDA multiples comparable companies currently trade at. That gives a value for the whole business (enterprise value); we then subtract net debt and anything owed ahead of common shareholders — minority interests in subsidiaries and preferred stock — and divide by shares outstanding to get a per-share range.
- Why it fits this industry
- EBITDA strips out financing and accounting choices, so two companies with different debt loads or depreciation schedules can be compared on the cash their operations actually generate.
- Reading this bar
- The bar is the per-share value range this method implies: a conservative low, a central estimate, and an optimistic high. If the current price sits below the bar, the market is pricing the shares below what this method's inputs suggest; if it sits above, the market is pricing them higher. No single bar is a verdict — methods disagree for good reasons, so read the whole field together. A company can also deserve a multiple above or below its peers — faster growth, stronger margins, or higher risk all justify honest gaps.
EV / EBITDA = (7.67/7.91/8.42)× ebitda 2,154,727,325.30 ≈ 16,521,588,313.00/17,035,620,123.39/18,133,109,810.97 (enterprise_value); enterprise_value -> per share: equity (2,849,779,597.22/3,363,811,407.61/4,461,301,095.19) / 991,642,733 shares [EV bridge: minus net debt 9,064,547,130.76, minus minority interest & preferred 4,607,261,585.02]
4 methods not shown
- EV / Revenue: the market prices this company far outside its sector's EV / Revenue range (its own multiple is 1.93 vs a sector band of 0.32–0.58) — a sector-average bar would be misleading here, so it is withheld
- EV / Gross Profit: implied equity value at the midpoint is non-positive (-7,866,758,749.90) — enterprise value does not exceed net debt; no price bar
- P / E: diluted EPS is non-positive — P/E is not meaningful for a loss-making period
- DCF (FCFF): DCF input(s) unavailable (capex) — cannot build FCFF
Limited data — fewer than three valuation methods could be formed for this company; showing every method we can stand behind.
Debt is most of what funds this company — its shares are about 14% of its total enterprise value. The enterprise-value bar here (1) value the whole business and then subtract the debt, so a small difference in the business's value becomes a large one per share. That is arithmetic, not a fault in the estimate, but it is why those ranges are wide.