Sigma Lithium Corp (SGML)
Market price: $7.95
2 valuation methods
- EV / Gross Profit: $0.00 to $2.46 (midpoint $0.63)
- EV / Revenue: $1.81 to $4.42 (midpoint $3.11)
How each method works
EV / Gross Profit: $0.00 to $2.46 (midpoint $0.63)
Values the business at a peer multiple of gross profit — useful where reported operating costs vary a lot across peers but gross economics are comparable.
- How it’s calculated
- We take last-twelve-month gross profit (revenue minus the direct cost of the goods or services sold), multiply it by the peer range of EV/Gross-Profit multiples, subtract net debt and any minority interests or preferred stock ranking ahead of common shareholders, and divide by shares outstanding.
- Why it fits this industry
- Gross profit sits between revenue and operating earnings: it credits the margin a company's products earn while ignoring overhead and investment choices that legitimately differ across peers.
- Reading this bar
- The bar is the per-share value range this method implies: a conservative low, a central estimate, and an optimistic high. If the current price sits below the bar, the market is pricing the shares below what this method's inputs suggest; if it sits above, the market is pricing them higher. No single bar is a verdict — methods disagree for good reasons, so read the whole field together.
EV / Gross Profit = (6.68/11.27/22.33)× gross_profit 18,422,000 ≈ 123,120,883.61/207,573,973.91/411,410,672.31 (enterprise_value); enterprise_value -> per share: equity (0/70,453,973.91/274,290,672.31) / 111,402,979 shares [EV bridge: minus net debt 137,120,000]
EV / Revenue: $1.81 to $4.42 (midpoint $3.11)
Values the whole business at a peer multiple of sales — used when earnings are thin, volatile, or not yet meaningful, so revenue is the most reliable yardstick.
- How it’s calculated
- We multiply the company's last-twelve-month revenue by the range of EV/Revenue multiples its peer group trades at, subtract net debt and any minority interests or preferred stock ranking ahead of common shareholders, and divide by shares outstanding for a per-share range.
- Why it fits this industry
- When profits are thin, volatile, or still to come, revenue is the most dependable figure a company reports — this method values the business on the scale of what it actually sells.
- Reading this bar
- The bar is the per-share value range this method implies: a conservative low, a central estimate, and an optimistic high. If the current price sits below the bar, the market is pricing the shares below what this method's inputs suggest; if it sits above, the market is pricing them higher. No single bar is a verdict — methods disagree for good reasons, so read the whole field together. A pound of revenue is worth more at a high margin than a low one, so the peer group here is narrowed to companies earning a similar margin wherever enough of them exist. Where too few do, the bar falls back to the wider group and is the bluntest of the multiples — weigh it alongside the earnings-based bars.
EV / Revenue = (3.08/4.40/5.72)× revenue 110,012,000 ≈ 338,888,992.70/484,127,132.43/629,365,272.16 (enterprise_value); enterprise_value -> per share: equity (201,768,992.70/347,007,132.43/492,245,272.16) / 111,402,979 shares [EV bridge: minus net debt 137,120,000]
4 methods not shown
- EV / EBITDA: EBITDA is non-positive — an EBITDA multiple yields no meaningful enterprise value (loss-making at the EBITDA line)
- P / E: diluted EPS is non-positive — P/E is not meaningful for a loss-making period
- P / B: the market prices this company far outside its sector's P / B range (its own multiple is 16.33 vs a sector band of 1.41–4.13) — a sector-average bar would be misleading here, so it is withheld
- DCF (FCFF): base unlevered FCF is non-positive (-1,540,360.00) — nothing to discount; a standard FCFF DCF does not apply
Pre-profit company — earnings-based methods not meaningful.
Limited data — fewer than three valuation methods could be formed for this company; showing every method we can stand behind.